Latest Public Sector News


PAC ‘sceptical’ on whether HS2 can deliver value for money

MPs are ‘sceptical’ about whether HS2 can “deliver value for money for the taxpayer”. 

The influential Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said they were “not convinced” that the current crop of expensive transport infrastructure projects overseen by the Department for Transport (DfT) are part of a clear strategic approach to investment in the rail network. 

They highlight, in particular, recent proposals for a railway connecting cities in the north of England – a possible HS3. The MPs suggest that the Department takes a piecemeal approach to its rail investment, rather than considering what would benefit the system as a whole and prioritising its investment accordingly. 

Margaret Hodge MP, chair of PAC, said: “Investment in major rail infrastructure programmes takes a long time and costs a lot of money. It is therefore hugely important to ask the right questions and make properly informed judgements on priorities. Yet the government takes decisions without a clear strategic plan.” 

She said the government “did not carry out an assessment of HS3 before it gave the go-ahead to HS2 and it therefore did not test whether improved connectivity in the north was a greater priority”. 

But a DfT spokesman said that HS2 will have a “transformational effect”, rebalancing the economy and helping secure the UK’s future prosperity, providing high value for money to the taxpayer, adding: “As the project moves forward towards construction we will continue to address the issues raised by the PAC, and, in particular, value for money.” 

The Committee’s latest report – ‘Lessons from major rail infrastructure programmes’ – says the lack of a clear strategic plan for the rail network means it is unclear how the Department makes decisions on the programmes to prioritise for investment. 

PAC wants the DfT instead to set out a long-term, 30-year strategy for transport infrastructure, which would inform decisions about investment priorities. 

The MPs are also concerned that HS2’s overall funding ‘envelope’ of £50bn, which includes a generous contingency, will “simply be used to mask cost overspends, rather than valid calls on contingency funds”. 

HS2 Ltd chair Sir David Higgins, appearing before the Transport Select Committee this week, rejected that concern when it was raised by MPs, promising “rigorous enforcement” on the use of contingency budgets, just as happened on the London Olympics. Higgins is the former chief executive of both Network Rail and the Olympics Delivery Authority. 

Jim Steer, director of Greengauge 21, a not-for-profit group established in 2006 to research and develop the concept of a high-speed rail network, said: “The PAC should be aware that it is the private sector that will design, build and operate HS2, creating a much stronger UK-based rail capability in the process. 

“So whereas the PAC presumes that it is for government to deliver the development around high-speed stations, saying the work around Ebbsfleet (on HS1) has come seven years too late, it’s much better that the private sector makes a leading contribution too. 

“It would only add to wider project costs falling to the taxpayer if government were to ‘force’ development prematurely, rather than leverage private sector investment as is now happening at Ebbsfleet.” 

The MPs noted that they also remain concerned over the Department’s ability to deliver on time and budget. On some past programmes, including modernisation of the West Coast Mainline and Thameslink, the Department has needed to extend timescales and alter its approach to bring programmes back on budget and schedule. 

A Department for Transport spokesman said: “It is the role of the PAC to ask questions that major projects like HS2 need to address as they move from planning to delivery. This scrutiny is welcome. The report sets out some of those questions in detail and acknowledges that progress is being made. 

“HS2 will have a transformational effect, rebalancing the economy and helping secure the UK’s future prosperity, providing high value for money to the taxpayer. With Sir David Higgins as chairman of HS2 Ltd, we are fully focused on keeping costs down and are determined that this vital part of the government’s long-term economic plan will be built on time and within budget.” 

Michael Dugher MP, Labour’s shadow transport secretary, said the report highlights the government’s “piecemeal approach to transport investment” and shows once again why “we need a long-term infrastructure plan rather than a short-term politically driven approach”. 

He added that Labour has repeatedly called for the establishment of an independent National Infrastructure Commission to ensure the government can better identify and deliver for the country’s long-term infrastructure needs. 

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email [email protected] 


David Mcleod   19/01/2015 at 13:29

This huge cost to enhance the economy is too centralised and the billions should be spent on our ports accesses - i.e. A120 Harwich International Port - This road not fit for purpose !!! - Roads and rail are the lifeblood of our economy and the billions proposed would prosper all of us if spent improving what we have got already.

Adam   19/01/2015 at 14:32

In my view David, HS2 *will* improve what we've got already - by taking lorries off the roads and express services off the classic rail network, it frees up oceans of road and rail capacity for other journeys and cuts congestion.

Michael Wand   27/01/2015 at 23:38

Rather than keep the UK's northern cities apart by building HS2 (do look at the map) the UK economy first needs a short HS3 between Leeds and Manchester Victoria. Scarcely 40 miles long, it would fast-connect the rail networks and city centres of East Lancs and West Yorks, join up an east-west Northern Cities Crossrail and create a cross-Pennine economy half as big again as Birmingham, well-removed from the London mega-magnet. Why, it might save the Chancellor a few billions, too. See:

Add your comment


public sector executive tv

more videos >

last word

Prevention: Investing for the future

Prevention: Investing for the future

Rob Whiteman, CEO at the Chartered Institute of Public Finance (CIPFA), discusses the benefits of long-term preventative investment. Rising demand, reducing resource – this has been the r more > more last word articles >

public sector focus

View all News


Peter Kyle MP: It’s time to say thank you this Public Service Day

21/06/2019Peter Kyle MP: It’s time to say thank you this Public Service Day

Taking time to say thank you is one of the hidden pillars of a society. Bei... more >
How community-led initiatives can help save the housing shortage

19/06/2019How community-led initiatives can help save the housing shortage

Tom Chance, director at the National Community Land Trust Network, argues t... more >


Artificial intelligence: the devil is in the data

17/12/2018Artificial intelligence: the devil is in the data

It’s no secret that the public sector and its service providers need ... more >