Latest Public Sector News

11.02.13

Lifetime social care costs to be capped at £75,000

The Government is due to announce a “fully-funded” solution to elderly people’s social care costs, with a £75,000 cap on lifetime costs – much higher than the Dilnot recommendations.

There is also expected to be a rise in the threshold for means-tested support from £23,250 to £123,000.

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt has said this will stop the “scandal” of people having to sell their homes to pay for their social care – 60% of people end up paying more than £100,000 in care costs.

The plans will be part-funded by freezing the inheritance tax threshold at £325,000 for individuals and £650,000 for couples for three years from 2015. Before the general election, Chancellor George Osborne had pledged to raise the threshold to £1m.

The Dilnot review recommended a cap of between £25,000 and £50,000 in 2010-11 prices and critics have suggested that £75,000 is too high.

Dilnot’s plan would have cost at least £2bn, but he said this morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “The cap that is being proposed is £75,000, we think in 2017 prices. That’s the equivalent of £61,000 in our terms, so it is higher than we would have wanted – £11,000 higher than the top end of our range, and I regret that, but I recognise the public finances are in a pretty tricky state. It doesn't seem to me that it is so different from what we wanted as to radically transform the basis of the system.”

Hunt said: “The point of what we are doing is to protect people's inheritance. The worst thing that can happen is that at the most vulnerable moment in your life you lose the thing you have worked hard for – your own house. We are trying to be one of the first countries in the world where people do not end up having to sell their house.

“We have a scandal at the moment that every year 30,000 to 40,000 people are having to sell their houses to pay for their care costs. Around 10% of us end up paying more than £100,000 in care costs.

“If you've got dementia, which is going to affect a million people in the next few years, you have this double whammy. You are trying to cope with this incredibly difficult condition, the loss of your memory, the impact on your relationships with your family. And then you have the double whammy of having to sell your home. That is what we want to sort out.”

He added that setting the cap at £75,000 would allow people to plan in advance for their old age. “Just as people make provisions for their pensions in their 20s and 30s, so we also need to be a country that prepares for social care as well.

“By setting an upper limit to how much people have to pay, then it makes it possible for insurance companies to offer policies, for people to have options on their pensions, so that anything you have to pay under the cap is covered.”

Shadow minister for care and older people Liz Kendall said the plans would not be fair on people with “modest homes”.

“Andrew Dilnot recommended a cap on care costs of £35,000 and warned that anything above £50,000 won't provide adequate protection for people with low incomes and low wealth.

“And these proposals won't do anything for the hundreds of thousands of elderly and disabled people who are facing a desperate daily struggle to get the care and support they need right now.

“We need a far bigger and bolder response to meet the needs of our ageing population: a genuinely integrated NHS and social care system which helps older people stay healthy and living independently in their own homes for as long as possible.”

National Pensioners Convention general secretary Dot Gibson said people are “still going to lose their homes” to pay for care, and urged politicians to consider a ‘national care service’, paid for out of general taxation and free at the point of delivery, like the NHS.

Tell us what you think – have your say below, or email us directly at opinion@publicsectorexecutive.com

Comments

Terry Mullard   11/02/2013 at 12:58

Well that's OK then, and the £75k does not include accommodation and food costs! The government suggests that people should 'save up' so that they will be able to afford these costs without selling their homes. BUT if you don't save, don't buy a house, but simply 'live the good life' you will have to pay absolutely nothing for your care. As a Conservative District Councillor, I just cannot see how on earth this proposal is meant to satisfy people, especially elderly, who may need care in the future. Wake up David and LISTEN to the electorate!

Owen   11/02/2013 at 14:26

Like Terry, I too am a Conservative Cllr, but probably unlike him my wife and myself have just had to sell her Mothers bungalow to fund her Nursing Care in a Care Home. At in excess of £1000 a week her savings had been wiped out, so what will this mean to us and her? We have already spent £40,000+ is this going to be back dated, I suspect not. So I echo Terry come on DC wake up and smell the coffee.

Lal   11/02/2013 at 15:43

Is there any estimate of weekly food and accommodation costs for residential care 2017 onwards? Need to know this in order to judge what people will still have to pay.

Leslie   12/02/2013 at 08:34

I'm sorry but I still can't understand why we are paying out benefits so freely to immigrants and their families living abroad. There is no means testing for them and yet we are still treating our elderly and their families in this callous, selfish way. Look after our own first!!! Please!!

Juliet   18/03/2014 at 09:16

It seems to me that those people who are lucky enough to have a house, whose value has risen through no doing of their own, should be prepared to sell it at the end of their life to pay for their own care. I would certainly expect to do precisely that, having helped the children as much as possible in the past. This would release more homes into the system and help to control the price rises to some extent (and then the young people might have more of a chance)..

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open more > more last word articles >

public sector focus

View all News

comment

Helping reduce energy costs

16/08/2017Helping reduce energy costs

Joseph Ernst-Herman, director of utilities and fuels at the Crown Commercia... more >
Leading in the challenging times ahead

16/08/2017Leading in the challenging times ahead

Following the Brexit vote, Cllr Philip Atkins OBE, County Councils Network ... more >

interviews

‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

30/06/2017‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

Keith Smith, public sector business development manager at Virgin Media Bus... more >

most read

the raven's daily blog

Delivering social value in public sector procurement

07/08/2017Delivering social value in public sector procurement

Theresa Grant, CEO of Trafford Council, explains how local authorities in the Greater Manchester area are making every penny of public spend provide that little bit more value f... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

editor's comment

14/08/2017Time for reflection

A lot has happened since the last edition of PSE was published. In particular, the snap general election delivered an astounding result that many of the pollsters and political experts could not have predicted when Theresa May initially called for it back in April. Chris Painter, Professor Emeritus at Birmingham City University, provides a fascinating analysis of the campaign, and assesses the aftermath of the election on pages 26-28. It is a must-read article.  During the... read more >