Latest Public Sector News

09.03.15

DWP workforce could shrink by more than a third

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) could see its staff numbers cut by more than a third in the next five years, according to senior civil servants. 

It was noted, though, that if Labour won the election the staff reduction would be less but still substantial, with 20,000 full-time equivalent employees facing the axe. 

The Institute for Government (IfG) has also released a report – Reshaping Government – which examines the impact of structural reforms on government effectiveness. 

It argues that rushed departmental changes often leave little legacy beyond enormous “disruption and a large bill for the taxpayer”. It adds that although reforms can work well when built around clear business needs – the 2001 creation of the Department of Work and Pensions is an example – they are often carried out too fast and for the wrong reasons. 

A report in the Financial Times says it has been estimated that of DWP’s 83,000-strong staff, about 30,000 employees responsible for welfare payments and pension policy could lose their jobs if a Conservative government takes power. 

Discussing the kind of structural reforms often necessitated by such drastic cuts, Tom Gash, the IfG’s director of research, said: “When money is tight, there can be no justification for ill-thought-through restructuring that costs millions and helps no one. 

“The next government must seek genuine reform of Whitehall – and that doesn’t mean chopping and changing departments. It means dealing with Whitehall’s inability to focus on long-term priorities and its weakness in co-ordinating policy across departments.” 

IfG makes four main recommendations, including the PM to be required to produce a supporting business case and a clear estimate of costs before implementing changes; Parliament should scrutinise and vote on substantial restructures; the cabinet secretary should develop specific capabilities at the centre to advise on structural change and governance; and the government should explore and develop collaboration across departments without structural change. 

Ian Watmore, the former Permanent Secretary of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills – founded in 2007, and merged with another department just two years later – commented: “Machinery of government changes should only be considered when the end result is truly strategic; when the business case is compelling in the long term; and when the short- to medium-term dips in performance and increases in cost are properly understood. 

“If all three of these are not in place then I would say: No, think about it hard; and then say No again. I strongly welcome the recommendations of the IfG report.” 

Tell us what you think – have your say below, or email us directly at opinion@publicsectorexecutive.com 

Comments

Takenocrap   09/03/2015 at 19:20

I do believe if any come unemployed and sign on them that have taken p-ss out them that unemployed by illegally sanctioning them they will pay them back ten fold I don't think need to explain what unemployed do to I bet unemployed are rubbing there hands in anticipation you bet .

Jonesm   10/03/2015 at 07:01

I do not think that any government will be able to deal with Whitehall's short-term attitude because the cause of it is political.

Lord Midas   24/03/2015 at 19:27

Please grow up boys. Mr Milliband's cronies caused much of the problem by not controlling finances. If we do not wish to end up bankrupt, like Greece, then we simply have to ALL control expenditure until it is under control. The last 5 years under a coalition have largely been a joke with pretend rather than real cuts. The next two years need to be properly focussed and then we can start to expand again - just like any well run business!

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open more > more last word articles >

public sector focus

View all News

comment

Support for councils following Grenfell

04/09/2017Support for councils following Grenfell

Ian Moore, CEO of the Fire Industry Association (FIA), discusses the wider ... more >
A quiet revolution

04/09/2017A quiet revolution

Dermot Ryan, programme director at NHS Digital for the Health and Social Ca... more >

interviews

‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

30/06/2017‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

Keith Smith, public sector business development manager at Virgin Media Bus... more >

the raven's daily blog

How do we deliver true social and economic value for the community?

18/09/2017How do we deliver true social and economic value for the community?

Five years on from the introduction of the Social Value Act, Alison Ramsey, frameworks co-ordinator at Scape Procure, reflects on the key questions that prompted the legislati... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

editor's comment

14/08/2017Time for reflection

A lot has happened since the last edition of PSE was published. In particular, the snap general election delivered an astounding result that many of the pollsters and political experts could not have predicted when Theresa May initially called for it back in April. Chris Painter, Professor Emeritus at Birmingham City University, provides a fascinating analysis of the campaign, and assesses the aftermath of the election on pages 26-28. It is a must-read article.  During the... read more >