Latest Public Sector News

22.02.17

Huge council engagement effort on STPs needed to make up lost ground

STPs must look to move away from “jargon and technical language” in order to clearly explain their purpose and rationale to lay readers, a report by the King’s Fund has revealed.

The review into STPs also stated that a “huge effort is now required to make up lost ground” to engage, consult and explain the case for STPs and what benefits they could deliver to improving social care services.

The Kings’ Fund went on to say that: “There is no readily available narrative that explains, in plain English, the rationale for STPs and what they mean for the public, underlining the communications challenge going forward.”

The report analysed the system of working of England’s 44 STPs and found that whilst they are the way forward for the NHS and social care, greater engagement with clinicians, patients and councils as well as greater transparency between STP developers and local government was needed in order to save a social care system in “crisis”.

Talking about the need for greater communication between STP developers and local councils the report stated: “STPs remain fragile and nascent additions to an already cluttered landscape, and their place in the governance of the NHS needs to be clarified to avoid unhelpful ambiguity and complexity.

“An urgent priority is to extend involvement in the development and implementation of STPs beyond the relatively small number of leaders within the NHS who have done much of the work to date. This means reaching out to staff, patients and the public as well as local authorities and the third sector. It will also require much more meaningful engagement with local and national politicians, whose understanding and support is essential if some if the more radical proposals in the plans are to be implemented.”

It also went on to look at new models of care that combined social services and health services, stressing the importance that there was collaboration and transparency between local government and NHS services, “to use existing health and social care services in the community more effectively and to fill gaps in provision”.

Combining care more effectively could save NHS services money by allowing care to be administered at home and avoid patients being forced to go straight to frontline NHS care services.

 However, the King’s Fund also addressed the growing concern over cuts to local council budgets by saying: “Cuts to local government funding, including public health budgets, will make it difficult to sustain existing preventive services, let alone expand them.”

 The LGA responded positively to the research stating that its warning about the dangers of cutting social and public care budgets and the need to improve prevention services and keep people out of hospital was welcome.

Chairman of the LGA’s Community Wellbeing Board, Cllr Izzi Seccombe said: “Councils see STPs as an important vehicle in redesigning local care and health services to improve health and wellbeing, and the quality of care.

“But we will be unable to achieve this without genuinely new money for social care. It is only by properly investing in social care that we can alleviate the pressures on the NHS.”

Cllr Seccombe also praised the report for highlighting the need to engage both the public and local authorities in STP development plans.

She added: “We have long warned that STPs can only be effective if councillors and communities are at the heart of the planning process. It is vital they are involved and not just consulted afterwards on pre-determined solutions. Any failure to engage councillors could lead to vociferous opposition.”

Chris Ham, chief executive of the King’s Fund, commented: “Local plans must be considered on their merits, but where a convincing case for change has been made, ministers and local politicians should back NHS leaders in implementing essential and often long-overdue changes to services.”

“A huge effort is needed make up lost ground by engaging with staff, patients and the public to explain the case for change and the benefits that will be delivered.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become a PSE columnist? If so, click here 

Comments

Clued-Up   23/02/2017 at 12:33

I think the King's Fund are being diplomatic - talking about what the STPs may one day become under a very different administration, not what they're currently designed to do. The Sec of State for Health told the NHS Confederation annual conference (17 June 2016) "The STPS are very simply about reducing hospital bed days ... and reducing emergency admissions." Another quote from the King's Fund Nov 2016 report on STPs "A number of [STP] leaders commented that closing gaps in NHS finances seemed to be the key priority for national NHS bodies". The STPs seem designed to cut the NHS bill regardless of the impact on patients, healthcare services or social care services. Hospitals are already near gridlock, approaching 95% bed occupancy rates at least one day a week this January. Community health is in an even worse state, with 8 out of 10 GPs reporting they can no longer deliver safe care for patients because of the lack of GPs and qualified nurses and the limitations of their existing accommodation. Almost all care and nursing homes are private-sector businesses - so many are closing and so few are willing to take LA funded residents that finding a place for even relatively fit, relatively trouble-free patients takes easily 3 - 6 weeks, sometimes many months. STPs address none of these very real problems. All they do is to pretend the problems can be wished away ... while further hacking away at the services patients so desperately need.

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open more > more last word articles >

public sector focus

View all News

comment

Driving forward a healthier Scotland

10/11/2017Driving forward a healthier Scotland

Dundee City Council is leading the way in boosting electric vehicle (EV) up... more >
A smarter approach to digital transformation

10/11/2017A smarter approach to digital transformation

Catherine Bright, Smarter Digital Services (SDS) manager, explains how a pa... more >

interviews

‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

30/06/2017‘The HSCN is the realisation of industry best practice’

Keith Smith, public sector business development manager at Virgin Media Bus... more >

the raven's daily blog

City-centric, deeply disappointing and a nightmare – criticisms pile against the Budget

22/11/2017City-centric, deeply disappointing and a nightmare – criticisms pile against the Budget

It’s been a busy day in the PSE office. Philip Hammond’s Autumn Budget included a number of interesting announcements, ranging from new devolution deals and housin... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

editor's comment

25/10/2017Take a moment to celebrate

Devolution, restructuring and widespread service reform: from a journalist’s perspective, it’s never been a more exciting time to report on the public sector. That’s why I could not be more thrilled to be taking over the reins at PSE at this key juncture. There could not be a feature that more perfectly encapsulates this feeling of imminent change than the article James Palmer, mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, has penned for us on p28. In it, he highlights... read more >