Latest Public Sector News

05.11.15

Cuts to social rent will transfer cash from councils directly to Whitehall

Reductions to social rents largely represent a transfer from councils and housing associations to the exchequer, not to social tenants, who will actually see little or no direct benefit from the cuts, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said.

The 1% annual reduction in social rents announced in the Summer Budget, effective from 2016, had already been criticised by local authorities – who claimed the move would both inflate service costs by £2.6bn as well as threaten plans for thousands of new homes.

But the IFS has now revealed that the cuts will also save Whitehall money while failing to serve the tenants it was designed to help. Entitlement to housing benefit will be reduced pound-for-pound as their rents drop.

And by reducing the annual rental income of councils and housing associations by £2.3bn, the housing supply will face a harsh blow. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that 14,000 fewer social sector homes will be built by the end of the decade.

Lower rents will also increase the financial incentive to seek and stay in social housing rather than looking into Right to Buy schemes that the government advocates.

But the slashed rents could also act as an incentive to move into work or increase earnings, since tenants will have less means-tested housing benefit to lose by doing so.

Robert Joyce, senior research economist at the IFS and co-author of the report, said the recent policy on social rents shows, in reality, “a worrying lack of consistency”.

“The government had committed to increasing social rents for ten years; but after just one of those ten years, it announced that rents will instead fall on the next four years. This instability could damage the ability of social landlords to plan and finance new housebuilding,” he added.

Pay to Stay

The report also analysed a similar policy introduced in the Summer Budget, ‘Pay to Stay’, which will force social landlords to charge market or ‘near market’ rents to tenants with pooled incomes above £30,000 from April 2017.

The IFS expects this policy to affect around 250,000 households per year (or 7% of social renting households), although four-fifths of those homes are in the top half of the income distribution.

But fundamental decisions around this scheme have yet to be made, such as how sharply rents will increase as tenants’ incomes move beyond the £30,000 cut-off. As a result, the effect on their incomes and work incentives and on revenue for councils and the government are still unknown.

Yet assuming that rents would jump to market levels once incomes hit the threshold, the IFS found that people earning just £1 more could be forced to pay up thousands of pounds extra. This would naturally lead to perverse incentives as any pay rise could trigger a sharp rent rise.

Instead, the institute said increasing rents gradually as incomes move past the threshold would be more sensible, although work incentives would still suffer a blow.

And contrary to cuts to social rents, the policy would increase the incentive for higher-earning tenants to leave the sector and exercise their Right to Buy – which could ultimately destabilise the economic diversity amongst social renters.

Andrew Hood, another research economist and co-author of the report, said: “There are trade-offs between the targeting of support and tenants’ incentives to increase their incomes.

“Pay to Stay will target the rent subsidy more closely on those in current need, but at the expense of weakening tenants’ work incentives.”

(Top image c. Yui Molk/PA Images)

Comments

Alan Grant   10/11/2015 at 14:15

This government has just got it in for landlords big and small,who will suffer? everyone who rents, everyone who lets yet this government will not stem the flow of people into the country. Lets get the hell out of EU

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open more > more last word articles >

public sector focus

View all News

comment

The power of apprenticeships

14/02/2018The power of apprenticeships

David Willett, corporate director at The Open University, describes how the... more >
Building connected communities

22/12/2017Building connected communities

Andrew Walker, policy researcher at the Local Government Information Unit (... more >

interviews

Are we taking a risk on education?

14/12/2017Are we taking a risk on education?

Adrian Prandle, director of economic strategy and negotiations at the Natio... more >

the raven's daily blog

Whole of government must act together to fulfil the ambition of the Industrial Strategy

11/12/2017Whole of government must act together to fulfil the ambition of the Industrial Strategy

Jen Rae, head of innovation policy at Nesta, says the aims in the government’s new Industrial Strategy are ambitious, but will require a shift in policymaking in order t... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

editor's comment

25/10/2017Take a moment to celebrate

Devolution, restructuring and widespread service reform: from a journalist’s perspective, it’s never been a more exciting time to report on the public sector. That’s why I could not be more thrilled to be taking over the reins at PSE at this key juncture. There could not be a feature that more perfectly encapsulates this feeling of imminent change than the article James Palmer, mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, has penned for us on p28. In it, he highlights... read more >