Counties slam ‘secret and underhand’ city council boundary takeover plot

Nottingham and Derby city councils have been accused of “secret and underhand” plans to expand their boundaries without proper consultation with residents or other authorities.

The concerns have come from the leaders of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire county councils, who fear that large areas of both counties could be swallowed up into a new huge authority as part of a ‘unified metropolitan area.’

The planned metro area will be comprised of Amber Valley, Ashfield, Broxtowe, Derby, Erewash, Gedling, Nottingham, Rushcliffe and South Derbyshire.

In the economic case for the Derby-Nottingham Metro, the cities describe the underfunding experienced by the areas. The document said that the region already has some characteristics of a metro area, but that if it started to act as one it would increase its economic benefits and drive more effective inclusive growth across the area.

The report claims that if Derby-Nottingham received the same level of government spending per head as Greater Manchester, its spend per person would increase by £800 – an additional £ for the metro.

However, councillors at the two county councils argued that they were only made aware of the plan yesterday – just days before its publication and following “months of work behind the scenes by the cities.”

Cllr Kay Cutts, of Nottinghamshire County Council, has expressed concerns that the city council “wishes to borrow millions of pounds in order to bring their plans to fruition, a most dangerous tactic.”

“This is a bombshell and has come completely out of the blue for the county council, sent to us just a matter of days before its official release,” she added.

Cutts explained that her decision to release the information into the public domain immediately is “in the public interest.” She claimed that there has been no discussion, consultation or suggestion from the city council that this piece of work was being done, despite regular contact with the county council.

“I feel let down – and so should the people of both counties and both cities,” she continued. “Only last week, I sat in the same room as the chief executive of Derby City and the leader of Nottingham City at a D2N2 board meeting discussing a raft of joint economic initiatives, without any mention of this.”

According to Cutts, Nottinghamshire County Council first raised concerns about the plan last September and made multiple requests for more information, clarity and involvement, but she claims that it heard nothing until yesterday.

“Residents living in the county should be alarmed by this plan – and not just because of the underhand way it has been put together or that it has cost £100,000 of public money to commission,” she argued.

“The report highlights that people choose to live in the county because of better educational standards, greater access to services such as libraries, day centres and youth centres and the overall quality of services. This report puts those things at risk for hundreds of thousands of county residents.

“To add insult to injury this report describes Gedling, Rushcliffe and Broxtowe as ‘hinterlands’ – which means ‘the land behind’. Is that what the city thinks about our communities?”

Cutts also said that she fears for areas such as Bassetlaw, Mansfield and Newark and Sherwood, which she says “would be frozen out of this metro fantasy land.”

She called the report “misleading,” with a “flawed argument,” and called for residents to be informed and consulted on the decision to change the county’s boundaries.

“Taxpayers have a right to have a say on any potential change of this magnitude. If the city is serious about taking over vast swathes of our county – turning communities like West Bridgford, Beeston and Hucknall into outer city limits – then the people deserve to know about it and be consulted,” the councillor concluded.

PSE has contacted Nottingham and Derby city councils for comment.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become a PSE columnist? If so, click here.


There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment


public sector executive tv

more videos >

latest news

View all News


Building a more diverse society

05/03/2018Building a more diverse society

Karl Wilding, policy director at the National Council for Voluntary Organis... more >
Developing our future leaders

05/03/2018Developing our future leaders

Kerry Bishop, apprenticeship and qualification development manager at the L... more >

editor's comment

25/10/2017Take a moment to celebrate

Devolution, restructuring and widespread service reform: from a journalist’s perspective, it’s never been a more exciting time to report on the public sector. That’s why I could not be more thrilled to be taking over the reins at PSE at this key juncture. There could not be a feature that more perfectly encapsulates this feeling of imminent change than the article James Palmer, mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, has penned for us on p28. In it, he highlights... read more >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open more > more last word articles >


Keeping London safe

05/03/2018Keeping London safe

Theo Blackwell, London’s first-ever chief digital officer (CDO), spea... more >

the raven's daily blog

Apprenticeship levy – five myths busted

05/03/2018Apprenticeship levy – five myths busted

On the first day of National Apprenticeship Week 2018 (NAW 2018), the director of the National Apprenticeship Service, Sue Husband, challenges some of the key myths around the... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

public sector events

events calendar


March 2018

mon tue wed thu fri sat sun
26 27 28 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8

featured articles

View all News