Interviews

19.04.16

Joint ventures: Are we better together?

Source: PSE - April/ May 16

Vivien Holland, local government advisory director at Grant Thornton UK LLP, examines the potential of Joint Ventures for local authorities going forward.

Local government is continuing to innovate and change as it looks for ways to protect frontline services. The changes are picking up pace as more local government bodies innovate by introducing alternative delivery models. While these new models are not a solution by themselves, they do add to the wider solutions being explored by councils such as devolution, collaboration and integration. 

We have been monitoring progress of alternative delivery models with interest and reporting our findings in a thought leadership series, which began with our report ‘Responding to the Challenge’ examining how councils were looking at a variety of models to tackle the financial challenges. 

Next came ‘Spreading their Wings: Building a Successful Local Authority Trading Company’ published in April 2015, which focused on the use of wholly-owned trading companies given their increase in popularity. A key advantage of a wholly-owned company is that the council is the sole shareholder and is able to retain any profits made, but it also must take all of the risk. 

The latest report in the series, which will be published in spring this year, considers Joint Ventures (JVs).  

JVs offer local authorities the opportunity to share the risk albeit with a lower share of the return. Partners in JVs typically bring capacity, expertise and investment, enabling a more commercial approach, but they need to be chosen with care. 

The experience of local government in relation to JVs has been mixed, with failures arising particularly where they have focused on the contractual aspects of the relationship rather than working together in partnership. This is more evident in cases where councils have partnered with a private sector provider. 

JV learning 

However, there is an emerging breed of JVs within the public sector in which councils partner with commercial companies that are themselves wholly-owned by councils. Their commerciality combined with public sector ethos makes them a viable option compared to the more traditional public-private partnerships. 

Our research has identified some key learning from JVs past and present. These include:   

  • Be clear on your objectives for setting up a JV such as income growth, cost savings and value to the community. If all you want to do is deliver savings, outsourcing may be better.
  • Take time in the procurement process. You need to be confident that the procurement process is capable of delivering the right JV partner who shares your values but also has the capacity to deliver.
  • Create a culture of trust and strong working relationships. There should be a ‘one team’ ethos between the council and the JV, and an understanding of the importance of communication across all stakeholders. In our experience, silences are filled with questions and uncertainties misinterpreted as significant risks.
  • Share profits and risk. It should not be possible for one party to benefit at the loss of the other partner.
  • Anticipate the changing environment in which the JV will operate throughout its lifetime, both operationally and politically. Put in place mechanisms to address future tensions, not just formal dispute processes but also regular meetings and guiding principles for how to expect to manage the relationship which will allow it to evolve and eventually exit.
  • Allow the JV to operate independently. The JV must be able to operate outside of the council focusing on income growth alongside improved service delivery and cost-reduction for the council. The temptation to make the JV another corporate directorate that acts in the same way as others needs to be resisted. 

Treading the line between contract management and partnership working may be challenging, and is the reason for past JV failures, but the selection of a partner and the building of trust is key to success. 

Our research has found that in many cases councils believe that they work better in a commercial setting when working in partnership, rather than operating alone. As one observer noted “it is better to have 50% of something rather than 100% of nothing”.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@publicsectorexecutive.com

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

latest public sector news

November too late for pay cap decision, GMB says

25/09/2017November too late for pay cap decision, GMB says

The GMB has criticised the government’s choice to defer the decision of ending the public sector pay cap until the Autumn Budget on 22 Nove... more >
LGA: TfL Uber decision shows need for ‘urgent reform’ of outdated taxi laws

25/09/2017LGA: TfL Uber decision shows need for ‘urgent reform’ of outdated taxi laws

Councils have this week declared that outdated taxi laws need to be urgently reformed following Transport for London’s (TfL’s) decisi... more >
Councils falling short of preventive care obligations

22/09/2017Councils falling short of preventive care obligations

Councils are failing to meet their obligations to prevent, reduce or delay the need for care as set out in the Care Act 2014. New research p... more >
149x260 PSE Subscribe button

the raven's daily blog

How would local government look under a Labour government?

25/09/2017How would local government look under a Labour government?

Few will disagree with the statement that the current landscape of local government is one that has been shaped by seven years of Tory influence. Harsh austerity measures have seen pressures on council-run services, as well as the NHS, mount sharply as demand increases. The resurgence of the Labour Party in June’s snap election... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

comment

Support for councils following Grenfell

04/09/2017Support for councils following Grenfell

Ian Moore, CEO of the Fire Industry Association (FIA), discusses the wider lessons of the tragic Grenfell Tower fire and what measures and assess... more >
A quiet revolution

04/09/2017A quiet revolution

Dermot Ryan, programme director at NHS Digital for the Health and Social Care Network (HSCN), talks to PSE about the importance of moving to the ... more >
Effective leadership in uncertain times

04/09/2017Effective leadership in uncertain times

Dr David Beech, lecturer in people management at Salford Business School, argues that continuous renewal and progress is fundamental to effective... more >
Refocusing professional development

04/09/2017Refocusing professional development

Graeme McDonald, managing director of Solace, discusses the importance of taking time out to focus on learning, especially in the ever-changing l... more >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the o... more > more last word articles >

editor's comment

14/08/2017Time for reflection

A lot has happened since the last edition of PSE was published. In particular, the snap general election delivered an astounding result that many of the pollsters and political experts could not have predicted when Theresa May initially called for it back in April. Chris Painter, Professor Emeritus at Birmingham City University, provides ... read more >

public sector focus

Make the census meaningful again

11/09/2017Make the census meaningful again

Christopher Gallagher, Public Sector – ... more >
Time to revisit community engagement and rebuild trust

30/08/2017Time to revisit community engagement and rebuild trust

The Grenfell Tower disaster revealed a number... more >