Welfare

17.01.17

NAO: Risks of outsourcing HMRC tax credits ‘outweighed the benefits’

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will not use another third-party provider to review and correct tax credit payments after its disastrous contract with Concentrix, a new report has said.

The National Audit Office’s (NAO’s) report into the failed contract revealed HMRC’s decision that the potential risk to customer service of using a third-party provider again “outweighed the benefits” offered.

HMRC signed a three-year contract with Concentrix in 2014 to provide additional capacity to review and correct personal tax credit payments, while HMRC continued to manage awards.

However, the pair agreed to terminate their contract in November last year due to Concentrix’s poor performance after complaints that claimants’ credit awards were incorrectly suspended or terminated.

“The chief executive and permanent secretary for HMRC highlighted that HMRC has learned five lessons from its contract with Concentrix,” concluded the report by Sir Amyas Morse, the comptroller and auditor general.

“These are: a need to prioritise claimants in delivering a public service; more thorough assurance about contingency planning; the speed of escalating issues to decision-makers who can resolve them; whether third parties can understand the subtleties of delivering a public service; and whether a contract with financial incentives for reducing error and fraud is the right mechanism to ensure good customer service.”

HMRC estimated in November 2013 that Concentrix would allow it to investigate a further 1.5 million tax credit awards a year, saving £1bn throughout the course of the contract, the NAO said.

However, HMRC later reduced its expected savings to £405m which it said was due to a two-month delay in the contract start date and Concentrix working fewer cases than had been expected.

The NAO found that Concentrix “consistently failed” to achieve over half its performance targets between November 2014 and September 2015, with staff answering an average of 4.8% of calls within five minutes in July 2015 despite the company’s target being 90%.

Concentrix had been failing to process compliances cases in accordance with its plans, leading to more contracts being terminated than expected and meaning that “resourcing in call centres was not sufficient to meet the resulting increase in customer calls”, the NAO said.

In August 2016, Concentrix was unable to cope with the unexpectedly high volume of claimant calls in part due to IT failures, in one week receiving 48,000 calls of which 18,000 were left unanswered. This led to HMRC taking steps to mitigate the impact on customers, reallocating a weekly average of 670 staff to tackle the backlog before terminating the contract, the NAO said. HMRC has also paid £86,815 in compensation for complaints relating to how Concentrix handled cases.

Despite the furore, the NAO found that HMRC still made substantial savings from the contract, which delivered estimated savings of £193m against a payment of £32.5m to Concentrix. Concentrix reported making a £20.5m loss as a result of the contract breaking down.

The step-by-step account of the fiasco has been slammed by the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), which represents most Civil Service staff.

“The failures at every level of the Concentrix deal, from mail handling and customer service to a lack of staff and poor contract management, shows perfectly why our public services should not be farmed out for profit,” said the PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka.

“All our warnings about privatising this work were ignored by HMRC senior managers who had fanciful ideas about the savings that could be made after having their budget slashed by the government.”

In November last year the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said that HMRC and the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) need to crack down on tackling benefit fraud and error following the collapse of the Concentrix contract.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become a PSE columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

Bill Brown   19/01/2017 at 15:04

Yet another private sector fiasco. Failing the public, costing millions to put right and for what. Ideology that says the Public Sector is bad and private good. So the Service users, public and everyone is let down. even Concentrix have lost £32M. i wonder if our mainstream media will do special front pages, investigations or revealing documentaries on how badly the british people are being let down.

Add your comment

 

related

public sector executive tv

more videos >

latest public sector news

London council ‘negligent and in denial’ over tower blocks at risk of collapse

22/06/2018London council ‘negligent and in denial’ over tower blocks at risk of collapse

Two tower blocks in North London are at risk of collapse, with the area’s council announcing it wants to begin re-housing residents “... more >
Christchurch allowed into High Court over Dorset council merger battle

22/06/2018Christchurch allowed into High Court over Dorset council merger battle

An ongoing battle between Christchurch Borough Council and a planned council merger has been given the go-ahead to proceed to the High Court. ... more >
Government does not ‘currently have understanding’ of skills businesses need going through Brexit

22/06/2018Government does not ‘currently have understanding’ of skills businesses need going through Brexit

Government departments “do not have sufficient understanding” of what skills UK businesses need, or how Brexit will impact the supply... more >

editor's comment

25/10/2017Take a moment to celebrate

Devolution, restructuring and widespread service reform: from a journalist’s perspective, it’s never been a more exciting time to report on the public sector. That’s why I could not be more thrilled to be taking over the reins at PSE at this key juncture. There could not be a feature that more perfectly encapsulates this... read more >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the open — and this needs to happen as soon as po... more > more last word articles >
London council ‘negligent and in denial’ over tower blocks at risk of collapse

22/06/2018London council ‘negligent and in denial’ over tower blocks at risk of collapse

Two tower blocks in North London are at risk of collapse, with the area’s council announcing it wants to begin re-housing residents “immediately.” The Tangmere and Northolt... more >
Christchurch allowed into High Court over Dorset council merger battle

22/06/2018Christchurch allowed into High Court over Dorset council merger battle

An ongoing battle between Christchurch Borough Council and a planned council merger has been given the go-ahead to proceed to the High Court. Last month, Christchurch council outlined its pl... more >

the raven's daily blog

The work of the vanguards can help overcome the challenges of integrated care

29/05/2018The work of the vanguards can help overcome the challenges of integrated care

Following the announcement of the second wave of integrated care systems (ICSs), NHS Providers, the NHS Confederation, NHS Clinical Commissioners (NHSCC) and the LGA reflect on how lessons learnt by members from across the four organisations – that have designed and worked together as part of the vanguards – will support the j... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >

comment

Grenfell, one year on

18/06/2018Grenfell, one year on

In the year since the Grenfell Tower disaster, the LGA has been working tirelessly to ramp up fire safety regulations and ban ‘desktop&rsqu... more >
Brexit's long shadow over devolution

18/06/2018Brexit's long shadow over devolution

The EU Referendum and the stop-start Brexit negotiations have left a looming shadow of uncertainty over devolution in the UK, writes Anthony Sala... more >
Decisions, decisions

18/06/2018Decisions, decisions

The true social value of procurement comes from asking challenging questions and thinking outside the box, argues Melissa Bell, sustainable procu... more >
Finding the balance

18/06/2018Finding the balance

Douglas White, head of advocacy at the Carnegie UK Trust, evaluates the risk-benefit relationship of data sharing within the public sector, highl... more >

interviews

Data at the heart of digital transformation

03/04/2018Data at the heart of digital transformation

SPONSORED INTERVIEW Grant Caley, UK & Ireland chief technologist at NetApp, speaks to PSE’s Luana Salles about the benefits of movin... more >
GDPR: The public sector scarecrow

03/04/2018GDPR: The public sector scarecrow

SPONSORED INTERVIEW PSE’s Josh Mines chats to Martin de Martini, CIO of Y Soft, about what the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)... more >
Keeping London safe

05/03/2018Keeping London safe

Theo Blackwell, London’s first-ever chief digital officer (CDO), speaks to PSE’s Luana Salles about the role he plays in ensuring the... more >
BIM: Digitising the public sector

19/02/2018BIM: Digitising the public sector

PSE’s Josh Mines talks to Stephen Crompton, CTO at GroupBC, and Stuart Bell, the company’s sales and marketing director, about how Bu... more >

public sector focus

  • 12/06/2018G-Cloud 10: small changes, big opportunities

    Rafael Cortes, Foehn head of marketing, explains how G-Cloud 10 should be a catalyst for innovative solutions and not a source of complacency. It was...
  • 04/06/2018Targets and tribulations

    David Willett, corporate director at The Open University, walks us through the university’s research into the apprenticeship levy, as well as...
  • 30/04/2018The legacy of Grenfell

    PSE’s Seamus McDonnell looks at the reactions of councils and the government to the Grenfell Tower fire, from the immediate aftermath to the...
View all News