Last Word

23.04.15

Stats, facts and evidence in the general election

Source: PSE - April/ May 15

Is there any hope of getting more evidence into political debates running up to May? Jonathan Breckon, head of the Alliance for Useful Evidence, explores the issues.

Surely inconvenient statistics and research go out the window when it comes to election time. It is much easier at this stage to promise some future billions on housing or tax gifts, and ignore the actual evidence. 

It would be unwise, however, for any politician to play too fast and loose with the facts. Campaign groups are marshalling to jump on any dodgy claims in the run up to the election. 

The UK’s Full Fact will be checking the statistics and evidence around health, immigration, education and other areas of social policy. They’ve set up a ‘war room’ of staff and volunteers who will work 18 hours a day, from 6am to midnight in the run-up to voting day. 

They have already built up quite a head of steam. Since launching in 2010, nearly every national newspaper – from the Sun to the Financial Times – and politicians of all hues have issued corrections at their request. It has many fans in the media too, from Peter Hitchens in the Mail on Sunday, to David Dimbleby on BBC Question Time, and Juliette Jowit in the Guardian. 

There are others also waiting to pounce on the politicians and pundits. Sense About Science’s campaigns ‘Evidence Matters’ and ‘Ask for Evidence’ are asking voters to hold candidates to account on the research behind their promises. They will celebrate politicians who get it right, expose those who don’t, and debate the uncertainty in between. 

And the Alliance for Useful Evidence, a network championing the use of evidence in social policy and practice, is working with media outlet The Conversation UK to evidence-check the major parties’ manifestos. Manifesto Check will use the expertise of university-based academic experts and researchers from think-tanks. Campaigning groups are excluded. To control for biases of the experts, The Conversation is also planning on some blind peer review – where social scientists evaluate the quality of other researchers’ work without knowing each other’s identities. 

Some of the more traditional media and think-tanks are also zeroing in on the election. The Channel 4 News factcheck blog crowd-sources some of its expertise to make sure the public are feeding in and they are not missing out. 

One of the UK’s oldest independent research bodies, The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, has examined the macroeconomic implications of parties’ fiscal plans – the only independent analysis so far. And if you want a post-mortem on the Coalition government, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has launched an election website, funded by the Nuffield Foundation (which is also funding Full Fact), analysing what has happened over the course of this Parliament and the implications of the different parties’ fiscal policies. 

However, this movement doesn’t end on voting day. In the next Parliament, the drive for making smarter use of evidence will grow. The fresh intake of MPs will get training from bodies such as the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. A campaign by the Royal Statistical Society has also got statistically illiterate MPs to sign up for statistics training. 

Checking basic statistical facts is one thing. But how much can we look at the much less clear-cut research evidence to clarify politicians’ claims on social policy? Will, say, reforms to welfare policy have research to back them up? Will changes to teaching do any good? These are difficult, nuanced and contested areas with no easy answers. 

Research offers some important caveats and qualifications, but rarely crystal clear right and wrong answers. That might not be headline-grabbing, yet it’s still important for voters to know that politicians’ certainties are misplaced. 

Fact-checking is now a global movement, boasting 80 organisations worldwide. Where did this all come from? The trend started during the 2004 US presidential election with organisations such as Factcheck.org, and from 2007 PolitiFact, a Pulitzer prize winner. In 2012, these bodies publicised false claims by President Barack Obama’s team about Mitt Romney’s business record, and misleading Romney statements about the economy and the bailout of the car industry. The Republican and Democratic parties had to employ staff just to deal with the fact-checkers. 

Politicians will always make bold claims that are hard to back up with evidence. And voters will – and should – vote for the things based purely on values and beliefs, sometimes against what the evidence tells us. But to make democracy work, we have a duty to inform the public.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@publicsectorexecutive.com

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

public sector executive tv

more videos >

latest public sector news

Academies mean councils struggling to take integrated approach to education

23/02/2018Academies mean councils struggling to take integrated approach to education

Councils are struggling to take an integrated approach to education in areas where high numbers of secondary schools are academies, a report by the... more >
Core Cities leaders press for domestic post-Brexit agenda after meeting with Barnier

23/02/2018Core Cities leaders press for domestic post-Brexit agenda after meeting with Barnier

Leaders and mayors representing Core Cities UK have met with the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier this week. The Brussels meeting saw leaders ... more >
DHSC seeks views on addressing care workforce challenges

23/02/2018DHSC seeks views on addressing care workforce challenges

A consultation focusing on the adult social care workforce has been launched by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), in partnership wit... more >

interviews

BIM: Digitising the public sector

19/02/2018BIM: Digitising the public sector

PSE’s Josh Mines talks to Stephen Crompton, CTO at GroupBC, and Stuart Bell, the company’s sales and marketing director, about how Bu... more >
Duncan Selbie: The energy of devolution

19/02/2018Duncan Selbie: The energy of devolution

The NHS plays a part in keeping the country well – but when it comes to places and their people, local government has a major role to fulfi... more >
Are we taking a risk on education?

14/12/2017Are we taking a risk on education?

Adrian Prandle, director of economic strategy and negotiations at the National Education Union (NEU), questions the stark lack of announcements a... more >
A fantastic opportunity awaits you

11/12/2017A fantastic opportunity awaits you

Eight months on from the government’s announcement of major training reforms, Anne Milton, minister for apprenticeships and skills at the D... more >

editor's comment

25/10/2017Take a moment to celebrate

Devolution, restructuring and widespread service reform: from a journalist’s perspective, it’s never been a more exciting time to report on the public sector. That’s why I could not be more thrilled to be taking over the reins at PSE at this key juncture. There could not be a feature that more perfectly encapsulates this... read more >

last word

The importance of openness after Grenfell

The importance of openness after Grenfell

Following the recent Grenfell Tower tragedy, Lord Porter, chairman of the LGA, argues that if the public are going to have faith in the safety testing process then everything must be out in the o... more > more last word articles >

comment

An unsettling finance settlement?

23/02/2018An unsettling finance settlement?

Piali Das Gupta, head of policy at Solace, looks over the final local government finance settlement and argues that it does not do enough to supp... more >
Finance settlement: a golden opportunity

23/02/2018Finance settlement: a golden opportunity

The local government finance settlement must enable counties to continue to be the engines of the English economy by providing a fairer funding a... more >
Data protection by design

23/02/2018Data protection by design

Nigel Houlden, head of technology policy at the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), looks at how organisations can win back public tru... more >
Citizen-centric cities for a better tomorrow

22/02/2018Citizen-centric cities for a better tomorrow

Mark Collin, group director of Ventures at ThoughtWorks, discusses how governments can learn from a bottom-up, citizen-focused approach to d... more >
Academies mean councils struggling to take integrated approach to education

23/02/2018Academies mean councils struggling to take integrated approach to education

Councils are struggling to take an integrated approach to education in areas where high numbers of secondary schools are academies, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has revealed. The ... more >
Core Cities leaders press for domestic post-Brexit agenda after meeting with Barnier

23/02/2018Core Cities leaders press for domestic post-Brexit agenda after meeting with Barnier

Leaders and mayors representing Core Cities UK have met with the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier this week. The Brussels meeting saw leaders of the 10 largest urban areas outside London discu... more >

the raven's daily blog

Whole of government must act together to fulfil the ambition of the Industrial Strategy

11/12/2017Whole of government must act together to fulfil the ambition of the Industrial Strategy

Jen Rae, head of innovation policy at Nesta, says the aims in the government’s new Industrial Strategy are ambitious, but will require a shift in policymaking in order to be realised in full. Last Monday saw the long-awaited launch of the UK’s new Industrial Strategy, the government’s plan for prosperity and growth in a ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the raven' >